<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:fireside="http://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>web01.fireside.fm</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 16:37:59 -0500</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>The Weekly Reload Podcast - Episodes Tagged with “The Washington Post”</title>
    <link>https://thereload.fireside.fm/tags/the%20washington%20post</link>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2023 05:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <description>A podcast from The Reload that offers sober, serious firearms reporting and analysis. It focuses on gun policy, politics, and culture. Tune in to hear from Reload Founder Stephen Gutowski and special guests from across the gun world each week.
</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle>A podcast featuring The Reload's Stephen Gutowski</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Stephen Gutowski</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>A podcast from The Reload that offers sober, serious firearms reporting and analysis. It focuses on gun policy, politics, and culture. Tune in to hear from Reload Founder Stephen Gutowski and special guests from across the gun world each week.
</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/0/006abb54-2cee-4879-907f-1104e1df2e3f/cover.jpg?v=17"/>
    <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:keywords>gun news, gun politics, firearms, policy, politics, culture, gun culture, gun ownership</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Stephen Gutowski</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>gutowski@thereload.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
<itunes:category text="News">
  <itunes:category text="Politics"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="News"/>
<itunes:category text="News">
  <itunes:category text="News Commentary"/>
</itunes:category>
<item>
  <title>Critiquing the Washington Post's Graphic Mass Shooting Pictures (ft. Bearing Arms' Cam Edwards)</title>
  <link>http://thereload.fireside.fm/critiquing-the-washington-posts-graphic-mass-shooting-pictures-ft-bearing-arms-cam-edwards</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">05f91fff-53b3-47fa-bcde-76d36779a7d7</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2023 05:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
  <author>Stephen Gutowski</author>
  <enclosure url="https://chrt.fm/track/418E8A/aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/006abb54-2cee-4879-907f-1104e1df2e3f/05f91fff-53b3-47fa-bcde-76d36779a7d7.mp3" length="67928507" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Stephen Gutowski</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>Host Stephen Gutowski and guest Cam Edwards discuss The Washington Post publishing graphic photos from certain mass shootings.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:10:14</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/0/006abb54-2cee-4879-907f-1104e1df2e3f/cover.jpg?v=17"/>
  <description>This week, we're discussing The Washington Post's controversial decision to publish graphic images from certain mass killings.
That's why I reached out to Cam Edwards, editor of Bearing Arms and longtime newsman, to give his opinion on the story and discuss mine as well. Cam recently interviewed Parkland father Ryan Petty about The Post's decision and how some families have reacted to it. He said Petty and several other families were disturbed by The Post publishing the images, especially since not everyone affected was directly contacted by the paper.
Cam argued that The Post's decision to selectively publish only pictures from mass shootings that featured AR-15s made the effort transparently political. We discussed how pictures from other mass killings are almost certainly equally disturbing. But The Post singled out AR-15s as part of a clear effort to get those particular guns banned, something that was underlined by an editorial published alongside the pictures.
Cam said he didn't view The Post's efforts as journalism. Instead, he argued the paper was engaged in direct activism.
Plus, Contributing Writer Jake Fogleman and I talk about the strange reasoning a federal judge used to uphold Colorado's gun waiting period. Special Guest: Cam Edwards.
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>guns, gun politics, second amendment, 2nd amendment, gun news, stephen gutowski, cam edwards, bearing arms, the washington post, mass shooting, mass shootings, parkland, sandy hook, uvalde</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>This week, we&#39;re discussing The Washington Post&#39;s controversial decision to publish graphic images from certain mass killings.</p>

<p>That&#39;s why I reached out to Cam Edwards, editor of Bearing Arms and longtime newsman, to give his opinion on the story and discuss mine as well. Cam recently interviewed Parkland father Ryan Petty about The Post&#39;s decision and how some families have reacted to it. He said Petty and several other families were disturbed by The Post publishing the images, especially since not everyone affected was directly contacted by the paper.</p>

<p>Cam argued that The Post&#39;s decision to selectively publish only pictures from mass shootings that featured AR-15s made the effort transparently political. We discussed how pictures from other mass killings are almost certainly equally disturbing. But The Post singled out AR-15s as part of a clear effort to get those particular guns banned, something that was underlined by an editorial published alongside the pictures.</p>

<p>Cam said he didn&#39;t view The Post&#39;s efforts as journalism. Instead, he argued the paper was engaged in direct activism.</p>

<p>Plus, Contributing Writer Jake Fogleman and I talk about the strange reasoning a federal judge used to uphold Colorado&#39;s gun waiting period.</p><p>Special Guest: Cam Edwards.</p>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>This week, we&#39;re discussing The Washington Post&#39;s controversial decision to publish graphic images from certain mass killings.</p>

<p>That&#39;s why I reached out to Cam Edwards, editor of Bearing Arms and longtime newsman, to give his opinion on the story and discuss mine as well. Cam recently interviewed Parkland father Ryan Petty about The Post&#39;s decision and how some families have reacted to it. He said Petty and several other families were disturbed by The Post publishing the images, especially since not everyone affected was directly contacted by the paper.</p>

<p>Cam argued that The Post&#39;s decision to selectively publish only pictures from mass shootings that featured AR-15s made the effort transparently political. We discussed how pictures from other mass killings are almost certainly equally disturbing. But The Post singled out AR-15s as part of a clear effort to get those particular guns banned, something that was underlined by an editorial published alongside the pictures.</p>

<p>Cam said he didn&#39;t view The Post&#39;s efforts as journalism. Instead, he argued the paper was engaged in direct activism.</p>

<p>Plus, Contributing Writer Jake Fogleman and I talk about the strange reasoning a federal judge used to uphold Colorado&#39;s gun waiting period.</p><p>Special Guest: Cam Edwards.</p>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
