<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:fireside="http://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>web02.fireside.fm</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 07:29:39 -0500</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>The Weekly Reload Podcast - Episodes Tagged with “Mark W Smith”</title>
    <link>https://thereload.fireside.fm/tags/mark%20w%20smith</link>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2024 05:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <description>A podcast from The Reload that offers sober, serious firearms reporting and analysis. It focuses on gun policy, politics, and culture. Tune in to hear from Reload Founder Stephen Gutowski and special guests from across the gun world each week.
</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle>A podcast featuring The Reload's Stephen Gutowski</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Stephen Gutowski</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>A podcast from The Reload that offers sober, serious firearms reporting and analysis. It focuses on gun policy, politics, and culture. Tune in to hear from Reload Founder Stephen Gutowski and special guests from across the gun world each week.
</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/0/006abb54-2cee-4879-907f-1104e1df2e3f/cover.jpg?v=17"/>
    <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:keywords>gun news, gun politics, firearms, policy, politics, culture, gun culture, gun ownership</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Stephen Gutowski</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>gutowski@thereload.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
<itunes:category text="News">
  <itunes:category text="Politics"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="News"/>
<itunes:category text="News">
  <itunes:category text="News Commentary"/>
</itunes:category>
<item>
  <title>Mark W. Smith on the Game Being Played With the Maryland AR-15 Ban Case</title>
  <link>http://thereload.fireside.fm/mark-w-smith-on-the-game-being-played-with-the-maryland-ar-15-ban-case</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">970ea2ee-01f0-4c77-9ce3-ed5951bc3bc3</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2024 05:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
  <author>Stephen Gutowski</author>
  <enclosure url="https://chrt.fm/track/418E8A/aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/006abb54-2cee-4879-907f-1104e1df2e3f/970ea2ee-01f0-4c77-9ce3-ed5951bc3bc3.mp3" length="73329851" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Stephen Gutowski</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>Host Stephen Gutowski and guest Stephen Gutowski discuss why the Maryland 'assault weapons" ban case was moved to the full Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:16:02</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/0/006abb54-2cee-4879-907f-1104e1df2e3f/cover.jpg?v=17"/>
  <description>This week, we are discussing a number of legal developments. So, we've got one of the preeminent pro-gun legal minds on the show.
Mark W. Smith, host of the Four Boxes Diner and member of the Supreme Court bar, joins me to talk about some complicated but fascinating cases. First and foremost, Smith explains why the case against Maryland's "assault weapons" ban has been moved on to be heard before the full Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals without the lower court panel that already held arguments issuing any decision. Smith predicted that might happen.
He said it was done to try and delay the case further. He argued the intent was to keep the Supreme Court from getting ahold of the case and potentially overturning the ban. Smith said that tactic was becoming more common among liberal-leaning courts in the wake of the Supreme Court's landmark Bruen decision.
But he also explained the Court may take up an AR ban case sooner than later anyway. He said it doesn't even necessarily need a circuit split, which is unlikely to happen anytime soon, to weigh in on the case.
Smith also weighed in on the Department of Justice's surprising brief in the NRA's First Amendment case at the Supreme Court. Plus, Contributing Writer Jake Fogleman and I talk about how a board member's letter brought the NRA's internal turmoil back out into the open. Special Guest: Mark W. Smith.
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>guns, gun politics, second amendment, 2nd amendment, gun news, stephen gutowski, mark w smith, ar-15, assault weapons, maryland, supreme court</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>This week, we are discussing a number of legal developments. So, we&#39;ve got one of the preeminent pro-gun legal minds on the show.</p>

<p>Mark W. Smith, host of the Four Boxes Diner and member of the Supreme Court bar, joins me to talk about some complicated but fascinating cases. First and foremost, Smith explains why the case against Maryland&#39;s &quot;assault weapons&quot; ban has been moved on to be heard before the full Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals without the lower court panel that already held arguments issuing any decision. Smith predicted that might happen.</p>

<p>He said it was done to try and delay the case further. He argued the intent was to keep the Supreme Court from getting ahold of the case and potentially overturning the ban. Smith said that tactic was becoming more common among liberal-leaning courts in the wake of the Supreme Court&#39;s landmark Bruen decision.</p>

<p>But he also explained the Court may take up an AR ban case sooner than later anyway. He said it doesn&#39;t even necessarily need a circuit split, which is unlikely to happen anytime soon, to weigh in on the case.</p>

<p>Smith also weighed in on the Department of Justice&#39;s surprising brief in the NRA&#39;s First Amendment case at the Supreme Court. Plus, Contributing Writer Jake Fogleman and I talk about how a board member&#39;s letter brought the NRA&#39;s internal turmoil back out into the open.</p><p>Special Guest: Mark W. Smith.</p>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>This week, we are discussing a number of legal developments. So, we&#39;ve got one of the preeminent pro-gun legal minds on the show.</p>

<p>Mark W. Smith, host of the Four Boxes Diner and member of the Supreme Court bar, joins me to talk about some complicated but fascinating cases. First and foremost, Smith explains why the case against Maryland&#39;s &quot;assault weapons&quot; ban has been moved on to be heard before the full Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals without the lower court panel that already held arguments issuing any decision. Smith predicted that might happen.</p>

<p>He said it was done to try and delay the case further. He argued the intent was to keep the Supreme Court from getting ahold of the case and potentially overturning the ban. Smith said that tactic was becoming more common among liberal-leaning courts in the wake of the Supreme Court&#39;s landmark Bruen decision.</p>

<p>But he also explained the Court may take up an AR ban case sooner than later anyway. He said it doesn&#39;t even necessarily need a circuit split, which is unlikely to happen anytime soon, to weigh in on the case.</p>

<p>Smith also weighed in on the Department of Justice&#39;s surprising brief in the NRA&#39;s First Amendment case at the Supreme Court. Plus, Contributing Writer Jake Fogleman and I talk about how a board member&#39;s letter brought the NRA&#39;s internal turmoil back out into the open.</p><p>Special Guest: Mark W. Smith.</p>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
