<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:fireside="http://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>web01.fireside.fm</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 03:56:59 -0500</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>The Weekly Reload Podcast - Episodes Tagged with “Dru Stevenson”</title>
    <link>https://thereload.fireside.fm/tags/dru%20stevenson</link>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 05:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <description>A podcast from The Reload that offers sober, serious firearms reporting and analysis. It focuses on gun policy, politics, and culture. Tune in to hear from Reload Founder Stephen Gutowski and special guests from across the gun world each week.
</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle>A podcast featuring The Reload's Stephen Gutowski</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Stephen Gutowski</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>A podcast from The Reload that offers sober, serious firearms reporting and analysis. It focuses on gun policy, politics, and culture. Tune in to hear from Reload Founder Stephen Gutowski and special guests from across the gun world each week.
</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/0/006abb54-2cee-4879-907f-1104e1df2e3f/cover.jpg?v=17"/>
    <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:keywords>gun news, gun politics, firearms, policy, politics, culture, gun culture, gun ownership</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Stephen Gutowski</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>gutowski@thereload.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
<itunes:category text="News">
  <itunes:category text="Politics"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="News"/>
<itunes:category text="News">
  <itunes:category text="News Commentary"/>
</itunes:category>
<item>
  <title>Unpacking Smith &amp; Wesson v. Mexico's Oral Arguments (ft. Professor Dru Stevenson)</title>
  <link>http://thereload.fireside.fm/unpacking-smith-wesson-v-mexicos-oral-arguments-ft-professor-dru-stevenson</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">7fd936fb-270f-4374-adbc-f77ed50f22a0</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 05:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Stephen Gutowski</author>
  <enclosure url="https://chrt.fm/track/418E8A/aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/006abb54-2cee-4879-907f-1104e1df2e3f/7fd936fb-270f-4374-adbc-f77ed50f22a0.mp3" length="92882078" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Stephen Gutowski</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>Host Stephen Gutowski and guest Dru Stevenson discuss Supreme Court oral arguments in Mexico's liability suit against American gunmakers.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:04:21</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/0/006abb54-2cee-4879-907f-1104e1df2e3f/cover.jpg?v=17"/>
  <description>This week, we've got a longer episode than usual.
That's because we're doing a deep dive into oral arguments for the Supreme Court's latest gun case, Smith &amp;amp; Wesson v. Mexico. Most observers, including me, thought Mexico faired poorly in its attempt to move forward with liability claims against American gunmakers over cartel violence south of the border. However, Professor Dru Stevenson, who studies gun policy at Southern Texas College of Law, had a bit of a different take.
So, I wanted to have him on the show to go through why he thought the justices may be more sympathetic toward Mexico's claims than most other people thought. While he still believes Mexico's suit is unlikely to make it through the Supreme Court unscathed, Stevenson argued the justices might allow part of it to proceed. And, even if not, he said The Court may end up laying out what amounts to a framework for how to successfully pierce gun industry liability protections in future suits.
Get a 30-day free trial for a subscription to The Dispatch here: https://thedispatch.com/join-offer-reload/?utmsource=thereload&amp;amp;utmmedium=partnerships-podcast&amp;amp;utm_campaign=0125 Special Guest: Dru Stevenson.
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>guns, gun politics, second amendment, 2nd amendment, gun news, stephen gutowski, supreme court, dru stevenson, scotus, smith and wesson</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>This week, we&#39;ve got a longer episode than usual.</p>

<p>That&#39;s because we&#39;re doing a deep dive into oral arguments for the Supreme Court&#39;s latest gun case, Smith &amp; Wesson v. Mexico. Most observers, including me, thought Mexico faired poorly in its attempt to move forward with liability claims against American gunmakers over cartel violence south of the border. However, Professor Dru Stevenson, who studies gun policy at Southern Texas College of Law, had a bit of a different take.</p>

<p>So, I wanted to have him on the show to go through why he thought the justices may be more sympathetic toward Mexico&#39;s claims than most other people thought. While he still believes Mexico&#39;s suit is unlikely to make it through the Supreme Court unscathed, Stevenson argued the justices might allow part of it to proceed. And, even if not, he said The Court may end up laying out what amounts to a framework for how to successfully pierce gun industry liability protections in future suits.</p>

<p>Get a 30-day free trial for a subscription to The Dispatch here: <a href="https://thedispatch.com/join-offer-reload/?utm_source=thereload&utm_medium=partnerships-podcast&utm_campaign=0125" rel="nofollow">https://thedispatch.com/join-offer-reload/?utm_source=thereload&amp;utm_medium=partnerships-podcast&amp;utm_campaign=0125</a></p><p>Special Guest: Dru Stevenson.</p>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>This week, we&#39;ve got a longer episode than usual.</p>

<p>That&#39;s because we&#39;re doing a deep dive into oral arguments for the Supreme Court&#39;s latest gun case, Smith &amp; Wesson v. Mexico. Most observers, including me, thought Mexico faired poorly in its attempt to move forward with liability claims against American gunmakers over cartel violence south of the border. However, Professor Dru Stevenson, who studies gun policy at Southern Texas College of Law, had a bit of a different take.</p>

<p>So, I wanted to have him on the show to go through why he thought the justices may be more sympathetic toward Mexico&#39;s claims than most other people thought. While he still believes Mexico&#39;s suit is unlikely to make it through the Supreme Court unscathed, Stevenson argued the justices might allow part of it to proceed. And, even if not, he said The Court may end up laying out what amounts to a framework for how to successfully pierce gun industry liability protections in future suits.</p>

<p>Get a 30-day free trial for a subscription to The Dispatch here: <a href="https://thedispatch.com/join-offer-reload/?utm_source=thereload&utm_medium=partnerships-podcast&utm_campaign=0125" rel="nofollow">https://thedispatch.com/join-offer-reload/?utm_source=thereload&amp;utm_medium=partnerships-podcast&amp;utm_campaign=0125</a></p><p>Special Guest: Dru Stevenson.</p>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
