<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:fireside="http://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>web01.fireside.fm</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 05:30:14 -0500</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>The Weekly Reload Podcast - Episodes Tagged with “Domestic Violence”</title>
    <link>https://thereload.fireside.fm/tags/domestic%20violence</link>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <description>A podcast from The Reload that offers sober, serious firearms reporting and analysis. It focuses on gun policy, politics, and culture. Tune in to hear from Reload Founder Stephen Gutowski and special guests from across the gun world each week.
</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle>A podcast featuring The Reload's Stephen Gutowski</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Stephen Gutowski</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>A podcast from The Reload that offers sober, serious firearms reporting and analysis. It focuses on gun policy, politics, and culture. Tune in to hear from Reload Founder Stephen Gutowski and special guests from across the gun world each week.
</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/0/006abb54-2cee-4879-907f-1104e1df2e3f/cover.jpg?v=17"/>
    <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:keywords>gun news, gun politics, firearms, policy, politics, culture, gun culture, gun ownership</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Stephen Gutowski</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>gutowski@thereload.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
<itunes:category text="News">
  <itunes:category text="Politics"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="News"/>
<itunes:category text="News">
  <itunes:category text="News Commentary"/>
</itunes:category>
<item>
  <title>The Tenth Circuit Oks Second Kind of Domestic Violence Restraining Order Gun Ban; ATF Announces Several Reforms</title>
  <link>http://thereload.fireside.fm/the-tenth-circuit-oks-second-kind-of-domestic-violence-restraining-order-gun-ban-atf-announces-several-reforms</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">66c5cc01-1e91-42d2-a38d-3c9539cd7fcb</guid>
  <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Stephen Gutowski</author>
  <enclosure url="https://chrt.fm/track/418E8A/aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/006abb54-2cee-4879-907f-1104e1df2e3f/66c5cc01-1e91-42d2-a38d-3c9539cd7fcb.mp3" length="86293201" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Stephen Gutowski</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>Reload Founder Stephen Gutowski outlines a big federal appeals court ruling on domestic abusers and a series of new reforms the ATF is undertaking.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>59:42</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/0/006abb54-2cee-4879-907f-1104e1df2e3f/cover.jpg?v=17"/>
  <description>The Tenth Circuit rules on the other kind of domestic violence restraining order that triggers a gun ban. However, it comes to the same conclusion that the Supreme Court did in US v. Rahimi: the ban doesn't violate the Second Amendment. The ATF also announced two significant moves, one replacing their "zero tolerance" dealer inspection policy and another expanding "Brady permits."  
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>guns, gun politics, second amendment, 2nd amendment, gun news, stephen gutowski, domestic violence, restraining orders, atf</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>The Tenth Circuit rules on the other kind of domestic violence restraining order that triggers a gun ban. However, it comes to the same conclusion that the Supreme Court did in US v. Rahimi: the ban doesn&#39;t violate the Second Amendment. The ATF also announced two significant moves, one replacing their &quot;zero tolerance&quot; dealer inspection policy and another expanding &quot;Brady permits.&quot; </p>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>The Tenth Circuit rules on the other kind of domestic violence restraining order that triggers a gun ban. However, it comes to the same conclusion that the Supreme Court did in US v. Rahimi: the ban doesn&#39;t violate the Second Amendment. The ATF also announced two significant moves, one replacing their &quot;zero tolerance&quot; dealer inspection policy and another expanding &quot;Brady permits.&quot; </p>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Gun Scholar David Kopel Explains SCOTUS Oral Arguments in Second Amendment Case</title>
  <link>http://thereload.fireside.fm/gun-scholar-david-kopel-explains-scotus-oral-arguments-in-second-amendment-case</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">f3294473-a428-44e5-b1fb-591e54cdf5b3</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2023 05:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
  <author>Stephen Gutowski</author>
  <enclosure url="https://chrt.fm/track/418E8A/aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/006abb54-2cee-4879-907f-1104e1df2e3f/f3294473-a428-44e5-b1fb-591e54cdf5b3.mp3" length="70782922" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Stephen Gutowski</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>Host Stephen Gutowski and guest David Kopel examine oral arguments in the Supreme Court's United States v. Rahimi case.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:13:21</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/0/006abb54-2cee-4879-907f-1104e1df2e3f/cover.jpg?v=17"/>
  <description>The Supreme Court just finished oral arguments in its latest Second Amendment case. So, this week on the show, we've got scholar David Kopel with us to give his perspective on the arguments made and the questions asked by the Justices in United States v. Rahimi.
Kopel was on the show about a month ago describing his brief in the case. And the issue in that brief came up in oral arguments. Kopel reacts to the discussion around the more problematic section of the federal law that bars those subject to domestic violence restraining orders from owning guns.
He also gave his view on the government retreating from the idea that anyone who isn't "law-abiding" or "responsible" can be disarmed. Kopel said that retreat was significant and could have implications for other Second Amendment cases coming down the line. At the same time, he said Rahimi's lawyer had to make his own retreats and the Justices seemed unsympathetic to his overarching argument.
Kopel predicted the Court would probably release its ruling before the summer and he expected it would uphold the ban. But he said the details of the ruling are harder to predict.
Plus, Contributing Writer Jake Fogleman and I discuss the massive upswing in Israeli civilian gun ownership after the October 7th attacks. Special Guest: David Kopel.
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>guns, gun politics, second amendment, 2nd amendment, gun news, stephen gutowski, david kopel, rahimi, domestic violence, gun bans, bruen, supreme court</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court just finished oral arguments in its latest Second Amendment case. So, this week on the show, we&#39;ve got scholar David Kopel with us to give his perspective on the arguments made and the questions asked by the Justices in United States v. Rahimi.</p>

<p>Kopel was on the show about a month ago describing his brief in the case. And the issue in that brief came up in oral arguments. Kopel reacts to the discussion around the more problematic section of the federal law that bars those subject to domestic violence restraining orders from owning guns.</p>

<p>He also gave his view on the government retreating from the idea that anyone who isn&#39;t &quot;law-abiding&quot; or &quot;responsible&quot; can be disarmed. Kopel said that retreat was significant and could have implications for other Second Amendment cases coming down the line. At the same time, he said Rahimi&#39;s lawyer had to make his own retreats and the Justices seemed unsympathetic to his overarching argument.</p>

<p>Kopel predicted the Court would probably release its ruling before the summer and he expected it would uphold the ban. But he said the details of the ruling are harder to predict.</p>

<p>Plus, Contributing Writer Jake Fogleman and I discuss the massive upswing in Israeli civilian gun ownership after the October 7th attacks.</p><p>Special Guest: David Kopel.</p>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court just finished oral arguments in its latest Second Amendment case. So, this week on the show, we&#39;ve got scholar David Kopel with us to give his perspective on the arguments made and the questions asked by the Justices in United States v. Rahimi.</p>

<p>Kopel was on the show about a month ago describing his brief in the case. And the issue in that brief came up in oral arguments. Kopel reacts to the discussion around the more problematic section of the federal law that bars those subject to domestic violence restraining orders from owning guns.</p>

<p>He also gave his view on the government retreating from the idea that anyone who isn&#39;t &quot;law-abiding&quot; or &quot;responsible&quot; can be disarmed. Kopel said that retreat was significant and could have implications for other Second Amendment cases coming down the line. At the same time, he said Rahimi&#39;s lawyer had to make his own retreats and the Justices seemed unsympathetic to his overarching argument.</p>

<p>Kopel predicted the Court would probably release its ruling before the summer and he expected it would uphold the ban. But he said the details of the ruling are harder to predict.</p>

<p>Plus, Contributing Writer Jake Fogleman and I discuss the massive upswing in Israeli civilian gun ownership after the October 7th attacks.</p><p>Special Guest: David Kopel.</p>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Author Mark W. Smith Explains the New Supreme Court Gun Case</title>
  <link>http://thereload.fireside.fm/author-mark-w-smith-explains-the-new-supreme-court-gun-case</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">ff37282a-7fa5-43b4-a68b-957d0b5bfe63</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2023 05:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Stephen Gutowski</author>
  <enclosure url="https://chrt.fm/track/418E8A/aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/006abb54-2cee-4879-907f-1104e1df2e3f/ff37282a-7fa5-43b4-a68b-957d0b5bfe63.mp3" length="68398620" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Stephen Gutowski</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>Host Stephen Gutowski and guest Mark W. Smith discuss the Second Amendment case the Supreme Court just agreed to hear.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:10:52</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/0/006abb54-2cee-4879-907f-1104e1df2e3f/cover.jpg?v=17"/>
  <description>The Supreme Court just agreed to take up a brand new Second Amendment case. So, we've got author and member of the Supreme Court bar Mark W. Smith on the show this week.
Smith, who also hosts the Four Boxes Diner YouTube channel, joins to talk about the ins and outs of United States v. Rahimi. The Supreme Court will have to decide whether the Second Amendment protects the right of those subject to a domestic violence restraining order to own guns. And, as Smith notes, it will be doing so for one of the least sympathetic defendants imaginable because Rahimi is the suspect in a long list of violent crimes.
That means the Court could rule to uphold the restriction, according to Smith. And that's why, he argues, the case was appealed straight up to the Supreme Court by Attorney General Merrick Garland even though there was another level of appeal he could have gone to first.
Still, Smith isn't convinced the case is that cut and dry. He argued the Court may well find the lower bar of evidence required to issue a restraining order compared to obtaining a criminal conviction could cause enough justices to turn against the restriction. And he said the Court has shown it is not as sensitive to public criticism as in previous years.
He said the decision to take this case to SCOTUS may backfire on Garland, but also admitted it's not clear where the Court will come down.
Plus, Contributing Writer Jake Fogleman and I talk about President Biden's "ghost gun" ban being vacated. And I discuss my continued frustrations with trying to renew my concealed carry permit. Special Guest: Mark W. Smith.
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>guns, gun politics, second amendment, 2nd amendment, gun news, stephen gutowski, mark smith, supreme court, rahimi, domestic violence</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court just agreed to take up a brand new Second Amendment case. So, we&#39;ve got author and member of the Supreme Court bar Mark W. Smith on the show this week.</p>

<p>Smith, who also hosts the Four Boxes Diner YouTube channel, joins to talk about the ins and outs of United States v. Rahimi. The Supreme Court will have to decide whether the Second Amendment protects the right of those subject to a domestic violence restraining order to own guns. And, as Smith notes, it will be doing so for one of the least sympathetic defendants imaginable because Rahimi is the suspect in a long list of violent crimes.</p>

<p>That means the Court could rule to uphold the restriction, according to Smith. And that&#39;s why, he argues, the case was appealed straight up to the Supreme Court by Attorney General Merrick Garland even though there was another level of appeal he could have gone to first.</p>

<p>Still, Smith isn&#39;t convinced the case is that cut and dry. He argued the Court may well find the lower bar of evidence required to issue a restraining order compared to obtaining a criminal conviction could cause enough justices to turn against the restriction. And he said the Court has shown it is not as sensitive to public criticism as in previous years.</p>

<p>He said the decision to take this case to SCOTUS may backfire on Garland, but also admitted it&#39;s not clear where the Court will come down.</p>

<p>Plus, Contributing Writer Jake Fogleman and I talk about President Biden&#39;s &quot;ghost gun&quot; ban being vacated. And I discuss my continued frustrations with trying to renew my concealed carry permit.</p><p>Special Guest: Mark W. Smith.</p>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court just agreed to take up a brand new Second Amendment case. So, we&#39;ve got author and member of the Supreme Court bar Mark W. Smith on the show this week.</p>

<p>Smith, who also hosts the Four Boxes Diner YouTube channel, joins to talk about the ins and outs of United States v. Rahimi. The Supreme Court will have to decide whether the Second Amendment protects the right of those subject to a domestic violence restraining order to own guns. And, as Smith notes, it will be doing so for one of the least sympathetic defendants imaginable because Rahimi is the suspect in a long list of violent crimes.</p>

<p>That means the Court could rule to uphold the restriction, according to Smith. And that&#39;s why, he argues, the case was appealed straight up to the Supreme Court by Attorney General Merrick Garland even though there was another level of appeal he could have gone to first.</p>

<p>Still, Smith isn&#39;t convinced the case is that cut and dry. He argued the Court may well find the lower bar of evidence required to issue a restraining order compared to obtaining a criminal conviction could cause enough justices to turn against the restriction. And he said the Court has shown it is not as sensitive to public criticism as in previous years.</p>

<p>He said the decision to take this case to SCOTUS may backfire on Garland, but also admitted it&#39;s not clear where the Court will come down.</p>

<p>Plus, Contributing Writer Jake Fogleman and I talk about President Biden&#39;s &quot;ghost gun&quot; ban being vacated. And I discuss my continued frustrations with trying to renew my concealed carry permit.</p><p>Special Guest: Mark W. Smith.</p>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
