<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:fireside="http://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>web01.fireside.fm</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 05:31:49 -0500</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>The Weekly Reload Podcast - Episodes Tagged with “Ak 47”</title>
    <link>https://thereload.fireside.fm/tags/ak-47</link>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2023 05:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <description>A podcast from The Reload that offers sober, serious firearms reporting and analysis. It focuses on gun policy, politics, and culture. Tune in to hear from Reload Founder Stephen Gutowski and special guests from across the gun world each week.
</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle>A podcast featuring The Reload's Stephen Gutowski</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Stephen Gutowski</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>A podcast from The Reload that offers sober, serious firearms reporting and analysis. It focuses on gun policy, politics, and culture. Tune in to hear from Reload Founder Stephen Gutowski and special guests from across the gun world each week.
</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/0/006abb54-2cee-4879-907f-1104e1df2e3f/cover.jpg?v=17"/>
    <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:keywords>gun news, gun politics, firearms, policy, politics, culture, gun culture, gun ownership</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Stephen Gutowski</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>gutowski@thereload.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
<itunes:category text="News">
  <itunes:category text="Politics"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="News"/>
<itunes:category text="News">
  <itunes:category text="News Commentary"/>
</itunes:category>
<item>
  <title>The Fate of 'Assault Weapons' Bans According to Gun-Rights Scholar David Kopel</title>
  <link>http://thereload.fireside.fm/the-fate-of-assault-weapons-bans-according-to-gun-rights-scholar-david-kopel</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">e9d0f351-ad7f-4e7b-b569-b9b44b64a688</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2023 05:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Stephen Gutowski</author>
  <enclosure url="https://chrt.fm/track/418E8A/aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/006abb54-2cee-4879-907f-1104e1df2e3f/e9d0f351-ad7f-4e7b-b569-b9b44b64a688.mp3" length="83523629" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Stephen Gutowski</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>Host Stephen Gutowski and guest David Kopel discuss the state of 'assault weapons' bans across the country.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:26:34</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/0/006abb54-2cee-4879-907f-1104e1df2e3f/cover.jpg?v=17"/>
  <description>Another federal judge ruled on Friday that so-called assault weapons bans likely violate the Second Amendment.
So, the Illinois ban is blocked for now. But Washington's was just signed. And Delaware's 2022 ban is still standing. Elsewhere, bans on the popular guns, including the AR-15, have been forestalled by political reality.
Independence Institute's David Kopel understands the fight well having just gone through it in his home state of Colorado, where Democrats who control the government weren't able to push a ban over the finish line. But he has also filed many court briefs and written even more books or academic papers on the topic from a pro-gun point of view. He joins the show to discuss the political and legal landscape in the fight over assault weapons bans.
What stopped Colorado's ban from going forward? Why has there been a sudden resurgence in blue states pushing for the bans? What is the legal argument against them? What is the state of the numerous lawsuits against AR-15 bans across the country?
And, most importantly, will the Supreme Court take up an assault weapons ban case soon? If so, what are they likely to decide?
Plus, Contributing Writer Jake Fogleman and I discuss the wide-reaching implications of the bump stock ban being stuck down by another federal appeals court. Special Guest: David Kopel.
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>guns, gun politics, second amendment, 2nd amendment, gun news, stephen gutowski, david kopel, assault weapons, assault weapons bans, ar-15, ak-47</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>Another federal judge ruled on Friday that so-called assault weapons bans likely violate the Second Amendment.</p>

<p>So, the Illinois ban is blocked for now. But Washington&#39;s was just signed. And Delaware&#39;s 2022 ban is still standing. Elsewhere, bans on the popular guns, including the AR-15, have been forestalled by political reality.</p>

<p>Independence Institute&#39;s David Kopel understands the fight well having just gone through it in his home state of Colorado, where Democrats who control the government weren&#39;t able to push a ban over the finish line. But he has also filed many court briefs and written even more books or academic papers on the topic from a pro-gun point of view. He joins the show to discuss the political and legal landscape in the fight over assault weapons bans.</p>

<p>What stopped Colorado&#39;s ban from going forward? Why has there been a sudden resurgence in blue states pushing for the bans? What is the legal argument against them? What is the state of the numerous lawsuits against AR-15 bans across the country?</p>

<p>And, most importantly, will the Supreme Court take up an assault weapons ban case soon? If so, what are they likely to decide?</p>

<p>Plus, Contributing Writer Jake Fogleman and I discuss the wide-reaching implications of the bump stock ban being stuck down by another federal appeals court.</p><p>Special Guest: David Kopel.</p>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>Another federal judge ruled on Friday that so-called assault weapons bans likely violate the Second Amendment.</p>

<p>So, the Illinois ban is blocked for now. But Washington&#39;s was just signed. And Delaware&#39;s 2022 ban is still standing. Elsewhere, bans on the popular guns, including the AR-15, have been forestalled by political reality.</p>

<p>Independence Institute&#39;s David Kopel understands the fight well having just gone through it in his home state of Colorado, where Democrats who control the government weren&#39;t able to push a ban over the finish line. But he has also filed many court briefs and written even more books or academic papers on the topic from a pro-gun point of view. He joins the show to discuss the political and legal landscape in the fight over assault weapons bans.</p>

<p>What stopped Colorado&#39;s ban from going forward? Why has there been a sudden resurgence in blue states pushing for the bans? What is the legal argument against them? What is the state of the numerous lawsuits against AR-15 bans across the country?</p>

<p>And, most importantly, will the Supreme Court take up an assault weapons ban case soon? If so, what are they likely to decide?</p>

<p>Plus, Contributing Writer Jake Fogleman and I discuss the wide-reaching implications of the bump stock ban being stuck down by another federal appeals court.</p><p>Special Guest: David Kopel.</p>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Cam Edwards of Bearing Arms on the House 'Assault Weapons' Ban</title>
  <link>http://thereload.fireside.fm/cam-edwards-of-bearing-arms-on-the-house-assault-weapons-ban</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">d84e186f-8ec2-463b-9b06-e12feb98738e</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2022 05:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Stephen Gutowski</author>
  <enclosure url="https://chrt.fm/track/418E8A/aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/006abb54-2cee-4879-907f-1104e1df2e3f/d84e186f-8ec2-463b-9b06-e12feb98738e.mp3" length="85403602" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Stephen Gutowski</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>Host Stephen Gutowski and guest Cam Edwards discuss the assault weapons ban moving through the House.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>59:02</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/0/006abb54-2cee-4879-907f-1104e1df2e3f/cover.jpg?v=17"/>
  <description>Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee voted to move an "assault weapons" ban for the first time in decades this week.
The move came as a bit of a surprise. Democrats haven't passed an assault weapons ban at the federal level since the original one expired in 2004. They didn't include one alongside the other measures in the gun-control package they passed in the wake of the Uvalde shooting.
So, I brought Cam Edwards from Bearing Arms on to discuss the changing tides. Cam is one of the most insightful pro-gun writers out there and has been for a long time. He follows gun developments in Congress as close as anyone.
He said the move is perplexing in light of the latest polling. Assault weapons bans have actually lost support since Uvalde. Quinnipiac University found support for a ban at an all-time low this week. And that drop in support has coincided with their increased popularity. The National Shooting Sports Foundation reported more than 24.4 million ARs and AKs in circulation this week.
Cam said Democrats are trying to use the ban as a wedge issue for their base. However, he doesn't see how the politics of passing the ban could help Democrats overcome the uphill battle they're facing in the midterm elections. He argued a show vote, which is what this will end up being if it does pass, is not going to satisfy most gun-control activists anyway.
He also laid out how much of an "if" this vote really is. Democrats still don't have all the votes nailed down. They might not ever get there.
Plus, Contributing Writer Jake Fogleman and I talk about the armed bystander who ended an Indiana mall shooting. Special Guest: Cam Edwards.
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>guns, gun politics, second amendment, 2nd amendment, gun news, stephen gutowski, cam edwards, assault weapons ban, ar-15, ar, ak, ak-47, congress, house of representatives</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee voted to move an &quot;assault weapons&quot; ban for the first time in decades this week.</p>

<p>The move came as a bit of a surprise. Democrats haven&#39;t passed an assault weapons ban at the federal level since the original one expired in 2004. They didn&#39;t include one alongside the other measures in the gun-control package they passed in the wake of the Uvalde shooting.</p>

<p>So, I brought Cam Edwards from Bearing Arms on to discuss the changing tides. Cam is one of the most insightful pro-gun writers out there and has been for a long time. He follows gun developments in Congress as close as anyone.</p>

<p>He said the move is perplexing in light of the latest polling. Assault weapons bans have actually lost support since Uvalde. Quinnipiac University found support for a ban at an all-time low this week. And that drop in support has coincided with their increased popularity. The National Shooting Sports Foundation reported more than 24.4 million ARs and AKs in circulation this week.</p>

<p>Cam said Democrats are trying to use the ban as a wedge issue for their base. However, he doesn&#39;t see how the politics of passing the ban could help Democrats overcome the uphill battle they&#39;re facing in the midterm elections. He argued a show vote, which is what this will end up being if it does pass, is not going to satisfy most gun-control activists anyway.</p>

<p>He also laid out how much of an &quot;if&quot; this vote really is. Democrats still don&#39;t have all the votes nailed down. They might not ever get there.</p>

<p>Plus, Contributing Writer Jake Fogleman and I talk about the armed bystander who ended an Indiana mall shooting.</p><p>Special Guest: Cam Edwards.</p>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee voted to move an &quot;assault weapons&quot; ban for the first time in decades this week.</p>

<p>The move came as a bit of a surprise. Democrats haven&#39;t passed an assault weapons ban at the federal level since the original one expired in 2004. They didn&#39;t include one alongside the other measures in the gun-control package they passed in the wake of the Uvalde shooting.</p>

<p>So, I brought Cam Edwards from Bearing Arms on to discuss the changing tides. Cam is one of the most insightful pro-gun writers out there and has been for a long time. He follows gun developments in Congress as close as anyone.</p>

<p>He said the move is perplexing in light of the latest polling. Assault weapons bans have actually lost support since Uvalde. Quinnipiac University found support for a ban at an all-time low this week. And that drop in support has coincided with their increased popularity. The National Shooting Sports Foundation reported more than 24.4 million ARs and AKs in circulation this week.</p>

<p>Cam said Democrats are trying to use the ban as a wedge issue for their base. However, he doesn&#39;t see how the politics of passing the ban could help Democrats overcome the uphill battle they&#39;re facing in the midterm elections. He argued a show vote, which is what this will end up being if it does pass, is not going to satisfy most gun-control activists anyway.</p>

<p>He also laid out how much of an &quot;if&quot; this vote really is. Democrats still don&#39;t have all the votes nailed down. They might not ever get there.</p>

<p>Plus, Contributing Writer Jake Fogleman and I talk about the armed bystander who ended an Indiana mall shooting.</p><p>Special Guest: Cam Edwards.</p>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
